{"id":690,"date":"2014-03-14T15:51:25","date_gmt":"2014-03-14T15:51:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/?p=690&#038;lang=fr"},"modified":"2016-01-08T12:36:18","modified_gmt":"2016-01-08T12:36:18","slug":"study-of-sparse-methods-for-tomography","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/?p=690","title":{"rendered":"Study of sparse methods for tomography"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<p>As part of tomography with a limited number of angles, the resulting inverse problem is ill-conditioned. The algorithms &#8220;classic&#8221;, analytic and algebraic produce many artifacts. The optimization methods solve this problem by using a regularization. In my work, I guess the parsimonious or sparse images in a given representation. A sparse image is an image that has few non-zero components. To promote this parsimony, I will rectify the problem with a standard <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/wp-content\/ql-cache\/quicklatex.com-3f31a9220bffec4cedfd8580bb0487c6_l3.png\" class=\"ql-img-inline-formula quicklatex-auto-format\" alt=\"&#92;&#101;&#108;&#108;&#94;&#49;\" title=\"Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com\" height=\"16\" width=\"13\" style=\"vertical-align: -1px;\"\/> and solve one of the two equivalent problems below.<\/p>\n<p><a name=\"id2709936819\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-center-displayed-equation\" style=\"line-height: 27px;\"><span class=\"ql-right-eqno\"> (3) <\/span><span class=\"ql-left-eqno\"> &nbsp; <\/span><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/wp-content\/ql-cache\/quicklatex.com-a00a9d8cd37edee4a90a33088a740078_l3.png\" height=\"27\" width=\"227\" class=\"ql-img-displayed-equation quicklatex-auto-format\" alt=\"&#92;&#98;&#101;&#103;&#105;&#110;&#123;&#101;&#113;&#117;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#42;&#125; &#92;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#101;&#116;&#123;&#120;&#92;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#92;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#104;&#98;&#98;&#123;&#82;&#125;&#94;&#110;&#125;&#123;&#92;&#116;&#101;&#120;&#116;&#123;&#109;&#105;&#110;&#125;&#125;&#92;&#32;&#92;&#124;&#120;&#92;&#124;&#95;&#49;&#32;&#92;&#116;&#101;&#120;&#116;&#123;&#32;&#115;&#46;&#116;&#46;&#32;&#125;&#32;&#92;&#124;&#92;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#104;&#98;&#102;&#123;&#65;&#125;&#120;&#45;&#121;&#92;&#124;&#95;&#50;&#92;&#108;&#101;&#32;&#92;&#100;&#101;&#108;&#116;&#97; &#92;&#101;&#110;&#100;&#123;&#101;&#113;&#117;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#42;&#125;\" title=\"Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com\"\/><\/p>\n<p><a name=\"id2868117999\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p class=\"ql-center-displayed-equation\" style=\"line-height: 37px;\"><span class=\"ql-right-eqno\"> (4) <\/span><span class=\"ql-left-eqno\"> &nbsp; <\/span><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/wp-content\/ql-cache\/quicklatex.com-1860757a0905e52ef0a18ce4b64c2b08_l3.png\" height=\"37\" width=\"201\" class=\"ql-img-displayed-equation quicklatex-auto-format\" alt=\"&#92;&#98;&#101;&#103;&#105;&#110;&#123;&#101;&#113;&#117;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#42;&#125; &#92;&#117;&#110;&#100;&#101;&#114;&#115;&#101;&#116;&#123;&#120;&#92;&#105;&#110;&#32;&#92;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#104;&#98;&#98;&#123;&#82;&#125;&#94;&#110;&#125;&#123;&#92;&#116;&#101;&#120;&#116;&#123;&#109;&#105;&#110;&#125;&#125;&#92;&#32;&#92;&#102;&#114;&#97;&#99;&#123;&#49;&#125;&#123;&#50;&#125;&#92;&#124;&#92;&#109;&#97;&#116;&#104;&#98;&#102;&#123;&#65;&#125;&#120;&#45;&#121;&#92;&#124;&#95;&#50;&#32;&#43;&#32;&#92;&#108;&#97;&#109;&#98;&#100;&#97;&#32;&#92;&#124;&#120;&#92;&#124;&#95;&#49; &#92;&#101;&#110;&#100;&#123;&#101;&#113;&#117;&#97;&#116;&#105;&#111;&#110;&#42;&#125;\" title=\"Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com\"\/><\/p>\n<p>My job is to assess the theoretical limits of these problems while being the closest to reality. Recent studies [3] have highlighted sufficient conditions ensuring the reconstruction of the image by minimizing <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/wp-content\/ql-cache\/quicklatex.com-3f31a9220bffec4cedfd8580bb0487c6_l3.png\" class=\"ql-img-inline-formula quicklatex-auto-format\" alt=\"&#92;&#101;&#108;&#108;&#94;&#49;\" title=\"Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com\" height=\"16\" width=\"13\" style=\"vertical-align: -1px;\"\/> and provide an error of this reconstruction [1]. These conditions require the existence of a particular vector called <em> dual certificate <\/em>. Depending on the application, it may be possible to calculate a candidate who will be a conditional <em> dual certificate <\/em> [2,4].<\/p>\n<p>This work primarily cover the construction of such candidates. I propose in my work, a greedy approach to calculate a candidate who is a <em> dual certificate <\/em> for almost all images &#8220;rebuildable&#8221; and minimizing the theoretical reconstruction error.<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p>[1] Charles Dossal and Remi Tesson. Consistency of l1 recovery from noisy deterministic measurements. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis, 2013.<\/p>\n<p>[2] Jean-Jacques Fuchs. Recovery of exact sparse representations in the presence of bounded noise. Information Theory, IEEE Transactions on, 51(10) :3601\u20133608, 2005.<\/p>\n<p>[3] Markus Grasmair, Otmar Scherzer, and Markus Haltmeier. Necessary and su\ufb03cient conditions for linear convergence of l1-regularization. Commun. Pure and Appl. Math., 64(2) :161\u2013182, 2011.<\/p>\n<p>[4] Samuel Vaiter, Gabriel Peyr\u00e9, Charles Dossal, and Jalal Fadili. Robust sparse analysis regularization. 2011.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As part of tomography with a limited number of angles, the resulting inverse problem is ill-conditioned. The algorithms &#8220;classic&#8221;, analytic and algebraic produce many artifacts. The optimization methods solve this problem by using a regularization. In my work, I guess the parsimonious or sparse images in a given representation. A sparse image is an image [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[24,16],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-optimization","category-traitement-dimages"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=690"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/690\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":774,"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/690\/revisions\/774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/image.math.u-bordeaux.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}